•   Exclusive

E-Commerce Innovation Needed by Retailers

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the March-April 2015 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

March-April 2015

Anyone who’s ever bought a house knows the realtor’s motto: Location, location,location. It’s the most important factor in determining the value of a property. Based on the press releases that come across my desk these days, supply chain’s motto is: Innovate,innovate, innovate. This issue includes approaches to inventory optimization, contract management with third party logistics providers and contract manufacturers, and the Goldilocks approach to supply management—an innovative concept aimed at keeping your procurement department from running too hot or too cold.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

Last summer I wrote a column titled “Holiday e-Commerce: Innovation Required” (SCMR Jul/Aug 2014). In it, I delved into the causes of the substantial late deliveries that occurred during the 2013 holiday season. Many gifts were not delivered in time to be put under the Christmas trees of lots of families. My view was that the e-retailers and parcel carriers set customer expectations too high. They positioned legacy services as if orders could be submitted as late as possible the day before, yet still be delivered by Christmas Eve. The media laid most of the blame on the parcel carriers despite the fact that retailers were equally—if not more—complicit. The carriers had not tailored their delivery services to accommodate holiday nuances, and retailers were characteristically struggling to handle large volumes of e-orders. 

I concluded that parcel carriers and e-retailers needed to jointly innovate new holiday delivery services, especially more realistic delivery schedules. They appeared to have done this as delivery performance vastly improved this past holiday season. Apparently the parcel carriers added costly capacity and convinced retailers to not overpromise delivery dates, as well as to provide forecasts that they would not exceed. While deliveries improved, brick-and-mortar retailers still struggled because they retro-fitted existing supply chains, rather than making the investments needed to succeed in e-commerce.


Short History of Mass-Market Retail

I started my career at a consulting firm with Sears, and Roebuck and Co. as a client. Sears was the Wal-Mart of its day as the highest grossing merchandizer. Sears was also an early version of a successful omni-channel retailer with two major sales channels: brick-and-mortar stores and mail order catalogs (the precursor to e-commerce). Its legacy catalog business grew from the late 1880s by servicing the expanding Western frontiers. Sears separately managed two supply chains.

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access.
Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the March-April 2015 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

March-April 2015

Anyone who’s ever bought a house knows the realtor’s motto: Location, location,location. It’s the most important factor in determining the value of a property. Based on the press releases that come across my…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the March-April 2015 issue.

Download Article PDF

Last summer I wrote a column titled “Holiday e-Commerce: Innovation Required” (SCMR Jul/Aug 2014). In it, I delved into the causes of the substantial late deliveries that occurred during the 2013 holiday season. Many gifts were not delivered in time to be put under the Christmas trees of lots of families. My view was that the e-retailers and parcel carriers set customer expectations too high. They positioned legacy services as if orders could be submitted as late as possible the day before, yet still be delivered by Christmas Eve. The media laid most of the blame on the parcel carriers despite the fact that retailers were equally—if not more—complicit. The carriers had not tailored their delivery services to accommodate holiday nuances, and retailers were characteristically struggling to handle large volumes of e-orders.

I concluded that parcel carriers and e-retailers needed to jointly innovate new holiday delivery services, especially more realistic delivery schedules. They appeared to have done this as delivery performance vastly improved this past holiday season. Apparently the parcel carriers added costly capacity and convinced retailers to not overpromise delivery dates, as well as to provide forecasts that they would not exceed. While deliveries improved, brick-and-mortar retailers still struggled because they retro-fitted existing supply chains, rather than making the investments needed to succeed in e-commerce.

Short History of Mass-Market Retail
I started my career at a consulting firm with Sears, and Roebuck and Co. as a client. Sears was the Wal-Mart of its day as the highest grossing merchandizer. Sears was also an early version of a successful omni-channel retailer with two major sales channels: brick-and-mortar stores and mail order catalogs (the precursor to e-commerce). Its legacy catalog business grew from the late 1880s by servicing the expanding Western frontiers. Sears separately managed two supply chains.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: 2025 trends with Abe Eshkenazi
ASCM CEO Abe Eshkenazi joins the Talking Supply Chain podcast to talk which trends will continue in 2025, and what they mean for supply chain…
Listen in

About the Author

Larry Lapide, Research Affiliate
Larry Lapide's Bio Photo

Dr. Lapide is a lecturer at the University of Massachusetts’ Boston Campus and is an MIT Research Affiliate. He received the inaugural Lifetime Achievement in Business Forecasting & Planning Award from the Institute of Business Forecasting & Planning. Dr. Lapide can be reached at: [email protected].

View Lawrence's author profile.

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service

Press Releases

Press Releases Submit Press Release