•   Exclusive

More about being “responsible”

My last Insights column, “Advocating for ‘responsible' supply chains,”* was written because I noted that in today's seemingly toxic, contentious and uncivil culture, people seem to be confusing being ethical with being responsible.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

This is an excerpt of the original article. It was written for the September-October 2019 edition of Supply Chain Management Review. The full article is available to current subscribers.

September-October 2019

It’s that time of year again, when we feature the Top 25 supply chains from Gartner. What I enjoy most about this research is the window it provides into where supply chains are going next: After all, while some lead, the rest of us follow.
Browse this issue archive.
Already a subscriber? Access full edition now.

Need Help?
Contact customer service
847-559-7581   More options
Not a subscriber? Start your magazine subscription.

My last Insights column, “Advocating for ‘responsible’ supply chains,”* was written because I noted that in today’s seemingly toxic, contentious and uncivil culture, people seem to be confusing being ethical with being responsible. However, they are two different concepts, in my view.

Ethical is defined as “pertaining to or dealing with morals or the principles of morality; pertaining to right and wrong in conduct.” Responsible, meanwhile, means “answerable or accountable, as for something within one’s power, control or management.” I believe the latter is more appropriate for business decisions, because the law dictates those business activities that are legal (think good) versus illegal (think bad).

I first used the term responsible in an Insights article where I postulated that companies over-outsourced over the past several decades.** At the time, I pointed to a variety of factors that might have incentivized companies to do so. However, I also felt that too many outsourcing decisions were not considering an important factor: Justice. That is, justice dictates that companies have a national debt to pay to their country of origin.

Because I never really appreciated the one philosophy course I took in college, several years ago I watched a PBS series, “Justice: What’s the Right Thing to Do;” based on a course given to undergrads at Harvard University by Professor Michael Sandel.

This complete article is available to subscribers only. Log in now for full access or start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

From the September-October 2019 edition of Supply Chain Management Review.

September-October 2019

It’s that time of year again, when we feature the Top 25 supply chains from Gartner. What I enjoy most about this research is the window it provides into where supply chains are going next: After all, while some…
Browse this issue archive.
Access your online digital edition.
Download a PDF file of the September-October 2019 issue.

Download Article PDF

My last Insights column, “Advocating for ‘responsible' supply chains,”* was written because I noted that in today's seemingly toxic, contentious and uncivil culture, people seem to be confusing being ethical with being responsible. However, they are two different concepts, in my view.

Ethical is defined as “pertaining to or dealing with morals or the principles of morality; pertaining to right and wrong in conduct.” Responsible, meanwhile, means “answerable or accountable, as for something within one's power, control or management.” I believe the latter is more appropriate for business decisions, because the law dictates those business activities that are legal (think good) versus illegal (think bad).

I first used the term responsible in an Insights article where I postulated that companies over-outsourced over the past several decades.** At the time, I pointed to a variety of factors that might have incentivized companies to do so. However, I also felt that too many outsourcing decisions were not considering an important factor: Justice. That is, justice dictates that companies have a national debt to pay to their country of origin.

Because I never really appreciated the one philosophy course I took in college, several years ago I watched a PBS series, “Justice: What's the Right Thing to Do;” based on a course given to undergrads at Harvard University by Professor Michael Sandel.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: Assessing the freight market
Is the freight market in a slump, or about to come out of one? AFS Logistics’ Andy Dyer breaks it down in this episode of the Talking Supply…
Listen in

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service

Press Releases

Press Releases Submit Press Release