•   Exclusive

Raising the Public Sector Bar Through Private Sector Best Practices

Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (WSSC), one of the nation's largest and oldest public utilities, turned to best-in-class procurement practices from the private sector to deliver big savings to its bottom line.

Subscriber: Log Out

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

Who hasn’t heard the story about the federal government’s acquisition of $5,000 toilets and $600 hammers? Then, there’s Astronaut John Glenn’s famous quip about the Apollo Spacecraft having been provided by the lowest bidder? Over the years, public sector procurement has been characterized as wasteful, inflexible, bureaucratic, and slow—and with some just cause. Public procurement employees are often seen as inflexible, unresponsive, and uncaring, a by-product of their tenure or membership in a collective bargaining organization.

These stereotypes are founded on a few aspects of public sector procurement that differ from private sector procurement. One is the fact that public procurement is tightly confined by government policies, regulations, and state and/or federal laws that are not only difficult to change and update, but which also have the added feature of sending those who violate them to jail. These laws also require potential suppliers to navigate an endless numbers of proverbial hoops while rewarding the successful low bidders with tons of paperwork and other contract compliance requirements.

As a result, public procurement is seen as a low bid competitive environment, with high barriers to entry, dominated by well-entrenched and politically connected mega-companies that provide the government over-priced products and services. Entrepreneurship, innovation, and continuous improvement are not expected and many times are simply not understood by public entity employees. The modus operandi is “if it works, don’t change it” or “that’s the way we’ve always done it.” Negotiations are rare and supplier partnerships (and other private industry best practices) are often discouraged as not applicable, or more times than we would like to admit, as against regulations or illegal. The most familiar, and often cited, performance metric for procurement personnel is the number of years until they qualify for full retirement.

This complete article is available to subscribers only.
Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access.
Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access.

SC
MR

Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.

Download Article PDF

Who hasn't heard the story about the federal government's acquisition of $5,000 toilets and $600 hammers? Then, there's Astronaut John Glenn's famous quip about the Apollo Spacecraft having been provided by the lowest bidder? Over the years, public sector procurement has been characterized as wasteful, inflexible, bureaucratic, and slow—and with some just cause. Public procurement employees are often seen as inflexible, unresponsive, and uncaring, a by-product of their tenure or membership in a collective bargaining organization.

These stereotypes are founded on a few aspects of public sector procurement that differ from private sector procurement. One is the fact that public procurement is tightly confined by government policies, regulations, and state and/or federal laws that are not only difficult to change and update, but which also have the added feature of sending those who violate them to jail. These laws also require potential suppliers to navigate an endless numbers of proverbial hoops while rewarding the successful low bidders with tons of paperwork and other contract compliance requirements.

As a result, public procurement is seen as a low bid competitive environment, with high barriers to entry, dominated by well-entrenched and politically connected mega-companies that provide the government over-priced products and services. Entrepreneurship, innovation, and continuous improvement are not expected and many times are simply not understood by public entity employees. The modus operandi is “if it works, don't change it” or “that's the way we've always done it.” Negotiations are rare and supplier partnerships (and other private industry best practices) are often discouraged as not applicable, or more times than we would like to admit, as against regulations or illegal. The most familiar, and often cited, performance metric for procurement personnel is the number of years until they qualify for full retirement.

SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article.

SC
MR

Latest Podcast
Talking Supply Chain: 2025 trends with Abe Eshkenazi
ASCM CEO Abe Eshkenazi joins the Talking Supply Chain podcast to talk which trends will continue in 2025, and what they mean for supply chain…
Listen in

Subscribe

Supply Chain Management Review delivers the best industry content.
Subscribe today and get full access to all of Supply Chain Management Review’s exclusive content, email newsletters, premium resources and in-depth, comprehensive feature articles written by the industry's top experts on the subjects that matter most to supply chain professionals.
×

Search

Search

Sourcing & Procurement

Inventory Management Risk Management Global Trade Ports & Shipping

Business Management

Supply Chain TMS WMS 3PL Government & Regulation Sustainability Finance

Software & Technology

Artificial Intelligence Automation Cloud IoT Robotics Software

The Academy

Executive Education Associations Institutions Universities & Colleges

Resources

Podcasts Webcasts Companies Visionaries White Papers Special Reports Premiums Magazine Archive

Subscribe

SCMR Magazine Newsletters Magazine Archives Customer Service

Press Releases

Press Releases Submit Press Release