Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
November 2013
Sales & Operations Planning is both a science and an art. Like any science, it relies on principles, rules, methodology, and specific measurable outcomes. But an S&OP implementation also calls for creative, incremental thoughts to address challenges. Browse this issue archive.Need Help? Contact customer service 847-559-7581 More options
The Supply Chain Council defines perfect order fulfillment as “the percentage of orders meeting delivery performance with complete and accurate documentation and no delivery damage.” The concept seems straight forward in practice, but it is often very difficult to accomplish. Leading contributors to this problem are outdated planning processes and disconnected execution systems that are too slow to respond to increased demand volatility; they lack visibility, increase supply chain risk, and cannot react quickly to unexpected supply chain events.
Take the example of a large, multinational manufacturer that had siloed back office systems, multiple distribution centers, scores of inventory locations, and a diverse mix of suppliers. They faced challenges around how to standardize business processes in order to gain visibility into inventory levels and the order fulfillment process; build a more efficient supply chain; and ultimately, improve customer satisfaction in an increasingly competitive environment.
Their initial thought was to “rip and replace” their existing legacy systems; however, this ambitious choice would have been extremely time-consuming, expensive, and disruptive. Value would only have emerged at the very end of a lengthy process. They also considered integrating the systems, an effort that might address today’s problems but lead them into the same situation down the road when their business processes changed again. The company ultimately determined that they needed the flexibility to change their business processes without the hassle of changing out all the systems in which they had invested during the last 30 years.
This complete article is available to subscribers
only. Click on Log In Now at the top of this article for full access. Or, Start your PLUS+ subscription for instant access. |
Not ready to subscribe, but need this article?
Buy the complete article now. Only $20.00. Instant PDF Download.
Access the complete issue of Supply Chain Management Review magazine featuring
this article including every word, chart and table exactly as it appeared in the magazine.
SC
MR
Sorry, but your login has failed. Please recheck your login information and resubmit. If your subscription has expired, renew here.
November 2013
Sales & Operations Planning is both a science and an art. Like any science, it relies on principles, rules, methodology, and specific measurable outcomes. But an S&OP implementation also calls for creative,… Browse this issue archive. Access your online digital edition. Download a PDF file of the November 2013 issue.Download Article PDF |
The Supply Chain Council defines perfect order fulfillment as “the percentage of orders meeting delivery performance with complete and accurate documentation and no delivery damage.” The concept seems straight forward in practice, but it is often very difficult to accomplish. Leading contributors to this problem are outdated planning processes and disconnected execution systems that are too slow to respond to increased demand volatility; they lack visibility, increase supply chain risk, and cannot react quickly to unexpected supply chain events.
Take the example of a large, multinational manufacturer that had siloed back office systems, multiple distribution centers, scores of inventory locations, and a diverse mix of suppliers. They faced challenges around how to standardize business processes in order to gain visibility into inventory levels and the order fulfillment process; build a more efficient supply chain; and ultimately, improve customer satisfaction in an increasingly competitive environment.
Their initial thought was to “rip and replace” their existing legacy systems; however, this ambitious choice would have been extremely time-consuming, expensive, and disruptive. Value would only have emerged at the very end of a lengthy process. They also considered integrating the systems, an effort that might address today’s problems but lead them into the same situation down the road when their business processes changed again. The company ultimately determined that they needed the flexibility to change their business processes without the hassle of changing out all the systems in which they had invested during the last 30 years.
SUBSCRIBERS: Click here to download PDF of the full article. |
SC
MR
Latest Supply Chain News
Latest Podcast
Explore
Topics
Latest Supply Chain News
- AdventHealth named top healthcare supply chain by Gartner
- Geopolitical readiness in supply chains: Strategic challenges for leaders
- Unlocking retention: The role employee engagement plays
- Can supply chain managers embrace an entrepreneurial mindset?
- Challenges to ESG reporting
- With capacity to spare, logistics real estate demand remains subdued
- More latest news